RADIALINĖS KRYPTIES PEAK-TO-PEAK POSLINKIO INTERVALAI KAIP PROCESINIS PAVIRŠIAUS ŠIURKŠTUMO PRIEŽIŪROS KRITERIJUS BAIGIAMAJAME EN AW-2011 ALIUMINIO LYDINIO TEKINIME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56131/tmt.2026.6.1.429Keywords:
turning, surface roughness, EN AW-2011, peak-to-peak displacement, vibration monitoring, process supervisionAbstract
This article presents a practical process-supervision interpretation of a broader calibration analysis that relates low-frequency radial (i.e., normal-direction) peak-to-peak displacement to surface roughness in finish turning of EN AW-2011 aluminum alloy. The study uses only a 190-record synchronized displacement-roughness analysis subset obtained in one controlled machine-tool-sensor setup. The regression calibration showed very strong within-dataset relations: Ra = 14,204 + 24,191V (R² = 0,9929, RMSE = 0,052 µm) and Rz = 63,207 + 105,253V (R² = 0,9905, RMSE = 0,264 µm). For operational interpretation, displacement values were divided into three empirical bands: low, medium, and high. Mean roughness increased monotonically across these bands, from Ra = 14,512 µm and Rz = 64,547 µm in the low band to Ra = 16,076 µm and Rz = 71,362 µm in the high band. An additional one-way ANOVA confirmed statistically significant differences between the bands (p < 0,001). The results support the use of displacement bands as a setup-specific warning logic for roughness-related supervision. However, the bands should not be treated as universal limits, because the data represent one time-ordered calibration sequence, and no independent validation set was used.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Renata Jackuvienė, Rimas Karpavičius

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.